Coronavirus update - please read

Following the Prime Minister’s latest announcement – our office doors are closed to the public.

However, we very much remain open for business with our teams working remotely and within our office premises, committed to providing you with the best possible service.  The health and wellbeing of our team, our clients and our visitors is our number one priority.

Heeding the current Government advice we have in place the following measures:

If you have any questions or queries, please do not hesitate to contact us at your local branch office, details of which can be found via our Contact Us page here


Close window
This message will not appear again for another 5 days
Home | News | Employee copied confidential company files after resigning

Employee copied confidential company files after resigning

November 25th 2020

A company has been granted a court order preventing a former employee from disclosing or using its confidential information, Mark Aspin Director & Head of Dispute Resolution reports.

The company, Rentrack Ltd, collected ticket sales data for cinemas. One of its employees, Mr Green, was approached by a competitor and offered a job in June 2020.

Before resigning, he bought a pay-as-you-go SIM card for a mobile phone and requested a global company report. He made copies of the files into a dropbox account, connected a USB drive to his work laptop and copied its entire contents. He then installed software to wipe the data from his phone and restore it to its factory setting.

Following a request by Rentrack, he did not deliver up the mobile phone or all emails.

The company contended that Green’s behaviour was suspicious, and it needed a court order to protect its confidential information from a competitor.

Green submitted that he had copied the files to help a colleague and that it was his normal practice to apply software to wipe his device. He further argued that he was willing to promise not to disclose or use any confidential information.

The two sides had agreed on the terms of a regime to cover the matters but differed on whether it should be a contractual regime or whether a penal notice should be attached.

The High Court ruled in favour of Rentrack. It held that there were several matters which entitled the company to be suspicious. It was clear that damages would be inadequate if Green were to disclose or make use of confidential information and if, contrary to his assertion, he did not hand over the devices.

By contrast damages would be adequate to compensate him if an order was made.

Green had promised in his employment contract not to disclose or use any confidential information and there was a serious issue to be tried as to whether he had acted in breach of that contract. It was appropriate to make an order prohibiting Green from disclosing or using Rentrack’s confidential information and requiring him to make a statement about any past use or disclosure.

If you would like more information about the above article please contact Mark on 01228 516666 or click here to send him an email.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...