Home | Business Law | Data Protection | Director ordered to pay £20,000 after breaching his duties

Director ordered to pay £20,000 after breaching his duties

May 13th 2019
 

By Mark Aspin Director

A director has been ordered to pay £20,000 for breaching his legal duties shortly before his company went into liquidation.

The director had run a freight-forwarding company from 2011 until its voluntary liquidation in 2015. He had been the sole shareholder.

His father had previously been a co-director of the company and continued to work for it. The company operated from the father’s home.

The director made the following transactions from the company between 2014 and 2015: two payments of £5,000 to a family friend, which he claimed was to repay a loan; two payments of £5,000 to the tax office, which he claimed were wages to his father paid directly to the tax office for the purposes of his father’s self-assessment; £360 paid to his mother, which he claimed was in exchange for Euros necessary for a business trip; two cheques made out to cash for £3,000 and £4,000, which he claimed were to repair a company lorry that had broken down in Germany; and a business rates payment in connection with an individual’s account of £1,897, which was paid into his mother’s account as the business rates were overdue and it prevented the bailiffs from seizing assets from the family home.

Once the company had gone into liquidation, the director set up a new freight-forwarding company of which he was the sole shareholder. The new company took on two of the old company’s contracts valued at £20,000.

The director stated that those contracts were directly attributable to a relationship between his father’s company, which was absorbed by the old company, and the client, and as such the new company was taking advantage of that relationship, not the relationship between the old company and the client.

The new company went into liquidation in 2017.

The liquidator asserted that the director had transferred the goodwill of the old company, namely the two contracts, at an undervalue and in breach of his duties as a director, and that the other transactions were also in breach of his legal duties.

The court held that the repayments to the director’s family friend had been properly made. However, other payments, including those to his father and mother, could not be justified.

The director was held liable to pay a total of £20,360, comprising of £10,000 from the goodwill contracts transferred from the old company, £10,000 from the payment for his father’s salary and £360 from the payment made to his mother.

If you would like more information about the issues raised in this article or any aspect of dispute resolution please contact Mark Aspin on 01228 516 666 or email him here.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...
 
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.