Home | News | Mother dismissed on maternity leave awarded more than £60k

Mother dismissed on maternity leave awarded more than £60k

November 29th 2021
 

A mother who was dismissed during her maternity leave while the ownership of her company changed hands has won her discrimination claim.

Jennifer Cafferky Solicitor in our employment team reports on this recent case

Mrs Rodin worked for HR company DMS1 and went on maternity leave in June 2017.

During her absence, the company underwent a change in ownership, with Dhillons Management Services taking over, although this company was also owned by the same people.

Mrs Rodin stopped receiving her maternity payments in August 2017 and contacted DMS1.

She was told that she had been dismissed from her role at DMS1, and that she could come and work for the new company Dhillons, but she would lose any maternity pay and benefits.

She was also told to ‘go to the Job Centre for any future money’.

Rodin did this but was told that because she was on maternity leave with DMS1, they were unable to assist, and it was the company that should be paying her.

She tried to contact managing director of both DMS1 and Dhillons Management Services, Mr Dhillon, but he did not respond.

The stress caused Mrs Rodin to become depressed, and she told the Employment Tribunal that she and her new-born daughter were ‘constantly crying’.

She saw her GP who prescribed her sleeping pills but after six months she was also put on a course of antidepressants and sent to therapy sessions.

The tribunal heard that this was the ‘worst time in her life’ as she was not able to enjoy the time with her baby daughter.

In contrast, a representative of Dhillons, told the tribunal: “It is unfair, why should I pick up the bill? Imagine it was the other way round, I hope you can see.”

However, the tribunal ruled in favour of Mrs Rodin.

Judge Sage noted in her summary that the companies DMS1 and Dhillons were “not unsophisticated” and in their roles as HR experts “there was no excuse for not knowing the law”.

She added: “Mrs Rodin had no job during her maternity leave and this had a detrimental and adverse impact upon her health and wellbeing, and this adversely impacted her ability to feed her child, which caused additional distress.”

Both companies were awarded to pay a total of £50,720 to Mrs Rodin for pregnancy and maternity discrimination and unfair dismissal.

Ms Sandhu, who worked as the office manager for Dhillons, and was a relative of the managing director Mr Dhillon, told the tribunal that Mrs Rodin had only attended the therapy sessions to ‘provide back-up for a big pay day’.

In response to these accusations, the award to Mrs Rodin was increased by £12,500 for injury to feelings.

If you would like more information about the issues raised in this article or any aspect of employment law please contact Jennifer on 01228 516666 or click here to send her an email.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...
 
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.