Home | News | Irish worker was racially harassed when boss mocked his accent  

Irish worker was racially harassed when boss mocked his accent  

April 19th 2022
 

The Employment Tribunal has ruled that an Irishman was racially harassed and victimised when his bossed danced “like a leprechaun” in front of him and mocked his accent.

Joanne Stronach Head of Employment and HR reports on this recent case.

The case involved Jonathan Kelly, who worked in the warehouse at the Oriental superstore Hoo Hing in Romford. 

When a warehouse colleague was nearly hit by some heavy items that fell after being stored incorrectly, Kelly spoke to his manager Michael Montgomery.  

Kelly said the items “could have done some damage to the poor girl”.  

He spoke quickly, and Montgomery responded by imitating him and mocking his speech. The manager bobbed his head and moved his shoulders from side to side. 

Montgomery put on a “mockery of an Irish accent” and said: “Well maybe if you slowed down I might be able to understand what it is you’re trying to say.”  

Kelly was deeply offended by Montgomery’s behaviour and found it “revolting”. 

He complained about the incident within the company but was made to wait in a room all day before a grievance meeting that lasted just 18 minutes. 

Montgomery denied the claims and said Kelly was being aggressive. 

Kelly then brought a claim for racial discrimination and victimisation. 

Montgomery told the Employment Tribunal that he was using humour to diffuse the situation. 

He added that he was born in Antrim, Northern Ireland and that he was using his family’s accent rather than mocking Kelly. 

However, the tribunal ruled in favour of Kelly. 

Judge David Massarella said: “The type of humour Mr Montgomery chose to employ was of the most crass and insensitive kind. 

“Mr Kelly was not merely upset by the conduct – he was deeply offended by it. We are satisfied that he felt that his dignity had been violated. We think he was genuinely outraged by the incident. 

“It would be difficult to argue that mocking somebody by adopting a stereotypical accent and set of gestures was anything other than inherently discriminatory. We have no hesitation in finding that it was. 

“We reject Mr Montgomery’s explanation that he was dropping into his own original accent, because the accent he adopted was not a Northern Irish accent, it was a mock southern Irish accent.

“The Claimant (Kelly) confirmed that the bobbing and moving of Mr Montgomery’s head and shoulders… was a mocking impersonation of a stereotypical Irish figure.” 

A remedy hearing will take place at a later date to decide compensation. 

For more information about the issues raised in this article or any aspect of employment law please contact Joanne on 01228 516666 or click here to send her an email.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...
 
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.