Home | News | Businesses warned over cutting sick pay for isolating unvaccinated employees

Businesses warned over cutting sick pay for isolating unvaccinated employees

February 3rd 2022
 

EMPLOYERS should think carefully before reducing sick pay for isolating unvaccinated staff, says a leading employment solicitor.

Joanne Stronach, who is Head of Employment Law and HR at Cartmell Shepherd Solicitors, said employers could put themselves at risk of contract or discrimination claims if they introduce rules without first seeking legal advice.

The warning comes after several national companies including Ikea and Morrisons cut sick pay for unvaccinated staff who are self-isolating due to Covid exposure.

All employees at the companies who test positive for Covid-19 – regardless of whether they are vaccinated – will still receive full sick pay.

However, unvaccinated staff who are required to isolate because they have been identified as a close contact of someone with the virus will only receive statutory sick pay unless there are mitigating circumstances.

Joanne said the inclusion of ‘mitigating circumstances’ was crucial to understanding the law behind the move.

She said: “Companies have introduced these measures in order to reduce the impact of the recent surge in Covid cases on staffing costs and to encourage vaccination but there are nuances to them which don’t always hit the headlines.

“There are many personal circumstances which might prevent someone from being vaccinated including serious medical conditions, pregnancy complications, religion or race. The circumstances could fall under protected characteristics under the Equality Act.

“The obligation will be on the employer to be able to objectively justify its reasons for the policy. Any mitigating circumstances being put forward will need to be considered carefully on a case-by-case basis.”

Self-isolation regulations were changed in December for vaccinated people, meaning they do not need to isolate even if they are in close contact with someone who has tested positive but are expected to take daily lateral flow tests.

However, the rules still require unvaccinated close contacts of people with the virus to self-isolate for 10 full days after their date of exposure.

Joanne said reducing sick pay to as little as the national statutory rate of £96.35 per week could lead to unvaccinated staff with a positive close contact choosing to come into work instead of self-isolating at home so they do not lose out financially.

She said: “Statutory Sick Pay is a big drop in income for many people and may lead to them not informing their employer that they have had a close contact who has tested positive and coming into work anyway.

“This attempt to reduce the financial impact of staff absence could potentially impact on the health and safety of the whole team if someone who poses a risk of infection comes into work. This could in turn lead to even more staff absences.

“I would advise businesses to consider their options carefully and, if you are thinking about introducing such measures, then only implement them in limited circumstances in order to avoid contract and discrimination claims, and only after seeking legal advice.”

Cartmell Shepherd Solicitors, which has six offices across Cumbria and Northumberland including Brampton, Penrith, Cockermouth, Haltwhistle, and two in Carlisle, can advise on all aspects of Employment Law, and staff members are on hand to answer all queries from businesses on the impact of Covid regulations on them or relating to unvaccinated staff.

Joanne Stronach can be contacted by calling 01228 516666.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...
 
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.