Home | News | Worker subjected to abuse on WhatsApp awarded £25,000

Worker subjected to abuse on WhatsApp awarded £25,000

August 20th 2021
 

A woman who stumbled across a workplace WhatsApp group featuring racially abusive remarks about her has been awarded nearly £25,000 for unlawful harassment on the grounds of sex, race and religious belief. 

Joanne Stronach Head of Employment & HR reports on this recent case.

The case involved Mrs Muna Abdi who worked as an operations clerk for Deltec in Hounslow. She was originally from Somalia and moved to the UK as a child.

In August 2018, Abdi, who wears a hijab, got involved in a discussion with work colleagues about white privilege. 

Abdi described it as a “vile discussion” in which two colleagues told her that most crimes in England are committed by black people.

Later, Abdi discovered a workplace WhatApp group chat about her, referring to her as a terrorist and a post box. One message said she should be made to suffer. Abdi found the messages offensive and threatening.

She complained to her line manager, Simon Hocking, who was part of the WhatsApp group. She felt he did not take the matter seriously, and simply told her that it was a case of “he said, she said”.

She also recorded a discussion with Hocking in which he said that, although he hated racism, “all that’s going to happen is it’s going to be you versus them three, and it’s going to go around in circles”.

She later found that the WhatsApp group name had been changed to “ALHAMDULLAH” and featured a picture of a black hijab. There were several racist messages about her. 

Abdi sent the screenshots of the message to a senior member of staff who passed them on to company’s chief executive, Mr Cunningham. He described the chat as having “extremely inappropriate and foul language and some derogatory and deeply unpleasant comments”.

Cunningham moved Abdi to a different department, pending a company investigation.

This led to Hocking being issued a final written warning, and two others involved in the chat group being dismissed.

Abdi said that some members of the WhatsApp group came into her new department and stared at her “with smirking faces”.

She resigned and brought a claim of unlawful harassment on the grounds of sex, race and religious belief. 

The Employment Tribunal found in her favour. It held that that the discussion violated her dignity and created an “intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating and offensive environment”. Moving her to a different department was not an adequate solution.

Employment judge Skehan said that Abdi was the “sole black, hijab-wearing member of staff within the group and the unlawful harassment was felt whether intentional or not, as an expression of hate for her religion, ethnic origin and gender”.

Abdi was awarded £24,945 for injury to her feelings and for her financial losses.

If you would like more information about the issues raised in this article or any aspect of employment law please contact Joanne on 01228 516666 or click here to send her an email.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...
 
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.