Home | Staff | Financial adviser unfairly dismissed after ‘spurious allegations’

Financial adviser unfairly dismissed after ‘spurious allegations’

December 6th 2019
 

A financial adviser was unfairly dismissed after his employer put unreasonable pressure on him to extend a restrictive covenant.

That was the decision of the Employment Tribunal in a case involving Peter Ward, who worked as a financial planning provider for Fiducia Comprehensive Financial Planning from 2009-2018.

In May 2018, Ward resigned from the company and gave his three months’ notice, stating that he intended to spend more time with his family.

He met with Marcus Grimshaw, who was a director of Fiducia. Grimshaw wanted to know where Ward was planning to work after he left.

Ward said he intended to work with Ms Catlin, who was a former colleague at Fiducia. Grimshaw became increasingly hostile.

He threatened to treat Ward as he had treated Catlin when she left if he joined a competitor.

Rumours in the office suggested he had arranged for a strongly worded letter threatening legal action to be sent to her home on the day of her wedding.

Ward wanted to end the meeting but Grimshaw continued forcefully expressing his views in an aggressive manner. Ward phoned another director, Anthony Scott who told him not to deal with Grimshaw in the future.

A company called Openwork, which provided services for Fiducia, later contacted Ward about a possible regulatory breach.

Scott became aggressive towards Ward, accusing him of serious misconduct including sending company documents to his private mail address and failing to disclose a large sum of money he had inherited from a client.

The following week. Fiducia sent a document to Ward that would increase his restrictive covenant from 12 months to 24 months following the end of his employment.

He was threatened that he would not receive commission he had already earned if he didn’t sign the document.

Ward refused to sign and submitted his second resignation. He left immediately and took legal action against Fiducia.

The Employment Tribunal ruled that Ward had been intimidated and bullied in the meeting with Grimshaw and subjected to false and spurious allegations intended to pressure him into signing the document.

Ward was awarded £17,199.12 compensation for unfair dismissal.

If you would like more information about the issues raised in this article or any aspect of employment law please contact Joanne on 01228 516666.

By Joanne Stronach Head of Employment & HR

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...
 
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.