Coronavirus update - please read

Following the Prime Minister’s announcement on the 31 October of a national lockdown, as of Thursday 5th November we are closing our office doors to the public.

However, we very much remain open for business with our teams working remotely and within our office premises, committed to providing you with the best possible service.  The health and wellbeing of our team, our clients and our visitors is our number one priority.

Heeding the current Government advice we have in place the following measures:

If you have any questions or queries, please do not hesitate to contact us at your local branch office, details of which can be found via our Contact Us page here

#AlwaysAtYourSide

Close window
This message will not appear again for another 5 days
 
Home | News | Vulnerable woman’s Will upheld despite daughter’s challenge

Vulnerable woman’s Will upheld despite daughter’s challenge

October 26th 2020
 

The High Court has upheld a vulnerable woman’s Will and rejected a claim by her daughter that she had been subjected to undue influence.

By Rebecca Armstrong Solicitor

The case involved two sisters, Teresa Ann Coles and Heather Christine Reynolds.

In 2002, their mother made a Will leaving her estate to be divided equally between them. However, the relationship between the two sisters deteriorated in 2009.

In 2012, the mother made another Will appointing Reynolds as sole executrix and beneficiary. She moved into a care home and died in 2013.

Coles brought an action to revoke a grant of probate made in favour of Reynolds.

She submitted that the 2012 Will was brought about by her sister’s undue influence and that their mother did not know or approve of the contents of the Will.

The High Court rejected the claim. It held that although Reynolds had assisted her mother in obtaining the services of solicitors, they had interviewed the mother on her own and she had given a contemporaneous statement explaining that she had not seen Coles for over a year.

She added that Coles had shown no interest in her for several years and she wanted Reynolds to benefit from her estate.

The solicitors’ attendance notes made it clear that the mother knew and approved of the Will’s contents and it had been read over to her and signed in Reynolds’ absence. The Will represented the mother’s testamentary wishes.

Although she was frail and vulnerable, her mental capacity was unchallenged. There was no credible evidence of financial abuse or that she had been forced to attend the appointment to execute the will or sign the contemporaneous statement.

If you would like more information about the issues raised in this article please contact Rebecca on 01228 516666 or click here to send her an email.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
We'll call you...